Cloakd

DOHMH rodent violations NYC

You got a rodent violation.
Here's what it means and what actually closes it.

Codes 04K and 04L are critical violations — each worth at least 5 points, fines up to $2,000, and a B in your window if you hit 14 points combined. Standard treatment clears the violation this cycle. It doesn't stop the same citation from appearing at the next unannounced visit. Here's what changes that math.

What the codes mean

Codes 04K and 04L: critical violations, immediate points, fines at OATH.

04K

Rats — live or evidence

Live rats, dead rats, fresh droppings, gnaw marks, burrows, or active rat signs in food or non-food areas.

04L

Mice — live or evidence

Same standard for mice. Evidence of live mice or mouse activity in food handling or storage areas.

5+

points minimum per critical

Each critical violation adds a minimum of 5 points to your inspection score. Multiple critical findings compound.

14

points = B grade

A B letter grade in your window. One rodent violation plus any other critical puts most restaurants past that threshold.

Fine amounts

Rodent violations carry fines from $300 to $2,000 per citation, set at an OATH hearing. You can settle before the hearing by admitting to the violation, typically at a reduced amount. Repeat violations within a short period are treated as a pattern and typically carry higher fines and increased inspection frequency.

How inspections are triggered

DOHMH conducts unannounced inspections on a cycle based on your current grade. A 311 rodent complaint can also trigger an out-of-cycle visit. You cannot prepare for the inspection date — you either have the problem under control or you don't when they walk in.

What triggers the citation

Inspectors don't need to see a live rat. Evidence is enough.

An inspector who finds fresh droppings, gnaw marks on packaging, burrows near the exterior, or any sign of active rodent movement will issue a critical violation. Live rodents are the most serious finding, but evidence of recent activity is sufficient.

The timing problem: standard treatment clears the active colony. Within four to eight weeks, a new group moves in from the surrounding block. If the inspector arrives during week two after your treatment, you're clean. Week six, you're exposed to the same violation again.

There's no version of standard pest control that removes that variable. The inspection cycle and the replacement cycle run on similar timelines. What changes the math is reducing how fast the replacement population forms.

Active rat signs that trigger 04K

Live rats

Anywhere in the premises — kitchen, storage, dining, or non-food areas.

Dead rats

Found during the inspection. Evidence of prior activity even if currently inactive.

Fresh droppings

Along baseboards, in storage areas, near food or waste. Fresh droppings indicate recent activity.

Gnaw marks

On food packaging, structural wood, or utility penetrations. Signs of active feeding.

Burrows

Exterior burrow holes near building foundation or trash storage areas.

Grease marks

Smear marks along walls or pipes from repeated rat travel along the same path.

What changes the outcome

Closing the violation is different from closing the vulnerability.

Treatment closes the violation by clearing the active population. It doesn't reduce how fast the replacement forms. Inspectors increasingly want to see active management documentation, not just a service receipt.

What standard treatment gives you

Cleared active population at the time of treatment

Service receipt documenting the visit

Licensed exterminator compliance documentation

4 to 8 weeks before replacement pressure builds back

What the 90-day program adds

Documented declining trend — not just point-in-time treatment

Monthly track count comparisons against Week 1 baseline

Population that decreases rather than cycling back

A record that shows active, continuous, measured management

Your existing vendor stays — this adds a layer, not a replacement

A 90-day record showing declining track counts is a different conversation with an inspector than "we called the exterminator last month." It shows the problem is trending down, not just treated and waiting to return.

Field data

What a two-phase managed program produces over 90 days.

79%

reduction in rodent track presence

Location A — 5-month urban field study, Aug 2025 to Jan 2026

88%

drop in track density at the same site

Tracks per monitoring plate declined even where some activity remained

90%

fertility reduction potential

When Evolve runs alongside an active pest control program

Source: SenesTech, Inc. — February 18, 2026

Start before the next unannounced visit.

The 90-day program takes time to produce a documented trend. The sooner it starts, the more distance you have between your kitchen and the next inspection.